About This Repository
Disclaimer: The contents of this website are based on public records, media reports, and
personal documentation. Please read the
Disclaimer before proceeding.
Faruq Marican CEO of Popsical and customer complain.
Source: Stomp.sg
×
Introduction
This website serves as a public repository documenting alleged unfair business practices, consumer
exploitation, and legal actions involving Charaku Pte Ltd (operating as
Popsical) and its co-founder, Faruq Marican (Marican Faruq Umar).
Once a prominent karaoke startup in Singapore, the company was ordered to wind up by the High Court in 2024
following legal action by the Composers and Authors Society of Singapore (COMPASS) over unpaid music
royalties. Despite this liquidation, consumers have reported continued unauthorized charges, an inability to
cancel subscriptions, and a lack of accountability from the company's leadership.
Key Allegations at a Glance
- "Zombie" Charges: Consumers reported being charged up to three times their monthly
subscription fee (jumping from $10.99 to $29) even after the company faced liquidation and the
service became unreliable.
- Insolvency & Liquidation: Charaku Pte Ltd was placed under creditor's voluntary
liquidation in April 2024 and wound up by the court in June 2024 after failing to pay approximately
$1 million in copyright fees.
- Unresponsive Support: Users cited an inability to remove credit card details from
the platform and zero response from customer service channels, forcing many to cancel their bank
cards to stop deductions.
This site aims to consolidate these reports to inform the public and prevent further consumer financial
loss.
Read Full Details on Popsical Allegations →
Allege Contract Dispute Alert
- Unauthorized Control Allegations: Claims that digital access (CorpPass) was used to
transfer company ownership without proper payment or signed agreements.
- "System Error" Justification: Requests for admin access were allegedly based on
false claims of technical issues.
- Conflicting Statements: Evidence presented in legal filings suggests
inconsistencies in travel claims and transaction timelines.
- Ongoing Legal Scrutiny: Multiple High Court cases involving company share disputes
have been referenced.
Read Full Contract Dispute Details →